mayan pride, united fruit

Two packs of “Mayan Pride” snow peas from Guatemala (a Styrofoam bed wrapped in clear plastic). Three packages of cut parsely from Holland (each bunch of three stems in a sealed plastic bag). Peaches from Spain (nestled in a topless plastic box and wrapped in a plastic net bag).

Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I’d like to present exhibit A: the inventory of a Friday night dumpster run. Humble but telling evidence of western civilization’s obscene culture of excess, sealed in hygienic plastic and flown to Germany for your convenience.

Peaches in Germany in May? Dutch parsley? Guatemalan peas in Germany, ever? How many miles must our food travel before it becomes too absurd to stomach?

Over the last few days I’ve been devouring a maddening, inspiring book called The Revolution Will Not Be Microwaved: Inside America’s Underground Food Movements by Sandor Ellix Katz. The book goes through various absurdities in food regulatory law and describes the underground movements popping up in response. It also had a few things to say about the Guatemalan agriculture industry of which I hadn’t been previously aware.

“The United States has frequently supported the concentration of land and political power in the hands of large holders, most notably in Latin America, where large landowners in many cases have been U.S. citizens and corporations. For if one thing is worse than a fascist concentration of land, according to the capitalist mindset, it’s a communist expropriation of private property and redistribution of land.

“In 1945 more than half of Guatemala’s farmland consisted of plantations larger than one thousand acres, yet less than a fourth of the acreage of these plantation holdings was under cultivation. One U.S. corporation, United Fruit (now known as Chiquita), was the largest employer, landowner, and exporter in Guatemala, growing and exporting bananas, primarily to the United States. United Fruit prospered in Guatemala largely because it was able to secure the support of government officials there.

“In 1950 Guatemalans elected a new president, Jacobo Arbenz Guzman, who initiated a land reform policy of expropriating uncultivated portions of large plantations and redistributing the land in small plots. Around 1.5 million acres were taken and divided among one hunded thousand families. Some of the expropriated land belonged to United Fruit, which undertook a propaganda campaign in the United States to promote the idea that this represented the spread of communism to the Western Hemisphere.

“Newly elected President Dwight Eisenhower was a Cold War warrior eager to combat the perceived communist threat. In addition, various members of his administration had direct ties to United Fruit. The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) hatched a secret plot, code-named Operation Success, that overthrew Arbenz in 1954, aborting the political process there and throwing Guatemala into a state of repression and violent civil unrest that has persisted ever since.”

Despite the clear anti-capitalist tone, this is not propaganda–the information is well-documented historical fact that you can read about in a plethora of other maddening sources. As are many of the U.S.’s other corporate-gains-inspired coups. (If you’d like to know more about some of them, I recommend picking up any book by Howard Zinn for further reading.) The thought sends shivers down my spine.

And what about the snow peas we’d picked out of the trash? Were they from United Fruit too? I went back to the kitchen and looked at the label. “Mayan Pride,” it said. “A Small Growers Project, www.mayanpride.nl,” the label said. Strange that they would have a Dutch web domain, I thought. Domain name not yet registered, said my computer screen when I typed the address into my browser. Sneaky marketing to trick the fair-trade organic bunch into buying the same old shit? Or project so small they couldn’t actually afford to start the website? Who grew these peas? Under what conditions? And why do we need Guatemalan snow peas to be flown in from another continent when we could grown them in our own backyards?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Saturday May 23rd 2009, 1:35 pm 3 Comments
Filed under: conspiracies,dumpster diving,freegan

3 Comments so far. Please leave a comment.

Oooh, a perfect start to my summer reading! I love your pun, by the way (“devouring”).

Did I ever tell you that my high school history teacher was sort of buddies with Howard Zinn? And that “A People’s History…” was one of our two textbooks? I’m always quite pleased to tell people that, and affirm their suspicions that Vermont is by and large an ex-hippie settlement.

Will the next installment be about your own horticultural endeavors?

Comment by Jill 05.23.09 @ 8:17 pm

Guatamala, Cuba, Mexico, same story man. The weird/not so weird thing is that you could literally go through the excerpt you typed (thanks!) and replace President’s names and dates and countries & the rest is the same. Even the U.S. corporations — United Fruit, etc. — same! I think it’s wonderful that you checked up on the Mayan Pride pea company. In my cynical view, the name “Mayan Pride” reeks of not-so-Mayan, but, who knows. And, seriously, three little parslies per bag?! Just enough to garnish 1 meal to impress, huh. Ugh. Well, I know what I’ll be reading off the color-coordinated revolutionary bookshelf next time I’m in DE-land.

I name-dropped a couple Cats in my last post, something I have a feeling only you may appreciate.

& how wonderful that A People’s History of the U.S. was a course book in a high school history class! I’d heard rumors, but, woo! I’m curious what the students’ reactions were at the time..?

Comment by slvls 05.24.09 @ 6:48 am

Slvls–I’m always keen to tell people about my history class, because I think it was quite revolutionary. Our teacher was a card-carrying Socialist, literally, so those of us who had similar political leanings loved the class. He was not always a big hit with the conservative students, but the debates and discussions were always interesting and he was very good at diplomacy. His whole purpose in using Zinn’s book was to contrast Zinn’s telling of history with the textbook writers’ telling. Even if we didn’t remember the history, I think we all remember to question what we’re told is the “truth.”

Comment by Jill 05.24.09 @ 7:48 pm




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)