google, capitalism, grammar

So I’m sitting at my computer, working on a book review of It Was Never About A Hot Dog and a Coke!—which, coincidentally you should never read because it’s horrifically written—and I’m irritated because the author keeps capitalizing the word “black” when it’s used to describe a group of people, but doesn’t capitalize the word “white” when it’s used to describe a group of people. This strikes me, at the very least, as a rather glaring grammatical inconsistency that some proofreader should have caught, or, at the very worst, weirdly racist.

But I didn’t live through the Civil Rights Movement, so I thought I should look up some background information on the issue, which I was guessing had probably been discussed as much as the he/she issue or the chairman/woman/person shit.

So I go to Google and start to type “Why capitalize “black” when used to describe a race?” I got as far as “Why capitali-” and stopped, because Google had made one of its automatic “Is this what you’re trying to type?” suggestions, and it was: “Why capitalism works in the West.” Thanks, Google, but fuck off.

For those of you curious about the grammar issue in question, AP style is to capitalize neither “black” nor “white” when referring to people, though people who choose to capitalize “black” and not “white” have this to say:

The word “Black” is used around the world to describe people who have “racial” features indicating African ancestry. Please keep in mind that the convention of race has been discarded by science-genetically we are all one race, and the human-genome project proves we are all from Africa.

“Black” is also accepted by many Black people as an inoffensive description. It is a generalized description and can be supplemented by another description such as Black Canadian, Black African American, Nigerian American or Black Latino. However, many Black people describe themselves simply as being “Black,” and this reality is reflected in a body of literature, music and academic study.

I do not believe “white” needs to be capitalized because people in the white majority don’t think of themselves in that way. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with this–it’s just how it is. The exception is white supremacists who have a definite vision for what “white” means. Most American white people describe themselves in more defined terms, such as Irish American or Jewish. I will make the point that African Americans (descendents of slaves) cannot define themselves more accurately than an entire continent because their ancestry was obliterated by the practices of enslavers, which included breaking apart tribal and family bonds.

(www.diversityinc.com)

Fascinating, if not at times wishy-washy argument for capitalization, the last argument being the most poignant and inarguable. But the obsessive compulsive ex-proofreader in me still wants to side with AP.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...
Friday November 21st 2008, 4:03 pm 4 Comments
Filed under: books,conspiracies,words, writing

4 Comments so far. Please leave a comment.

Hehe, that’s the kind of thing that would really annoy me too. Although, you can get caught up in the proof-reading stuff and be reading a book/magazine for enjoyment, yet subconsciously be looking for mistakes…AP gets my vote too.

Comment by Alex 11.21.08 @ 4:57 pm

Wow. Talk about missing the point. Or maybe not. Maybe you got it just fine but didn’t like what it had to say, basically that racial violence in America is not ancient history. I’m white, and about Hurst’s age, i.e. came of age in the Civil Rights Movement and I knew nothing of this incident. I found this a fascinating read. So what that it’s in a more familiar than scholarly style. It’s a memoir, not a doctoral dissertation. Your taking umbrage at his use of Black and white, and never getting any farther in understanding his message, says more about you and race than it does about Mr. Hurst writing style.

Comment by Larry Vance 12.14.08 @ 12:42 am

Larry: If you go to the POD People website linked on this page you can search this book and find my full reveiw of it there. In said review, I give the book a pretty positive spin, because, I reasoned, it is always important to have as many personal accounts of events like this–especially of this particular time in America history–as possible, written by as many people as possible, than to have a book with a snappy writing style. There I say that it doesn’t so much matter that it’s written so familiarly, as it matters that Hurst wrote the book at all and that it’s out there, addressing issues that will soon get as much glossing-over in history class as the genocide of the American Indians.

Racism in America–in Europe, anywhere–is by no means ancient history, but this post is about a specific point that got me thinking, and that I figured I would expound on here, in order to get other people thinking about it. I hope you didn’t find it offensive. It was intended as a discussion of a grammar geek point, with a little bit of hey, we should all think about this a bit thrown in.

Comment by doodle 12.15.08 @ 1:52 pm




Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)